Table 2 Factors of farmer’s community groups

No.	Data	Variable	Explained as
1	The score of each farmer’s community groups	Y	Describe the level of success of the farmer’s community group. The higher the number, the more successful the group considered.
2	Age of leader	X1	The participation of a young leader is expected to increase the possibility of the farmer’s community group’s success. At the same time, a young leader would encourage other youth to participate in rural development. According to WHO, youth is described as productive age of 18–65 years old. But according to UU No. 40 Tahun 2019, the young people of Indonesia range between 18–30 years old.
3	The year of existence of each farmer’s community groups	X2	The year of existence would explain the experience of the farmer’s community group. The longer the existence, to some extent, would give more time for the group to gain experience and success.
4	Woman and man Participation in each farmer’s community groups	X3	Dummy variable. The participation of both gender in the groups would balance their role to the success of the group. The groups with both gender as their member would receive “1” as the score, and the groups with only one kind of gender would receive “0” as the score.
5	Number of members	X4	Members are assets for the organization, and they can contribute to the progress of the farmer community organization.
6	The previous existence of farmer’s community group as an institution	X5	Dummy variable. If the farmer’s community group were previously an informal institution in the society, in this case, “subak”, it would be given “1” as the score. If the farmer’s community group had no form of the Institution previously, it would be given “0” as the score.
7	The participation of Join farmers’ group’s association (Gapoktan)	X6	Dummy variable. The participation of a farmer’s community group in a larger organization would give more access to information, knowledge, profitable opportunity, and so on. Positive participation of farmer’s community group would receive “1” as the score while non-participation would receive “0” as the score.
8	Dedication of members to each farmer’s community groups	X7	To be omitted. Data not available.
9	The infrastructure of each farmer’s community groups	X8	To be omitted. Data not available.