| 1) Perception of partners that knowledge is shared in the project (yes/no) |
| 2) Proportion of partners that perceive that they are learning from the other partners (%) |
| 3) Share of partners that can provide examples of joint learning (%; number) |
| 4) Examples of concrete knowledge sharing (yes/no; no.) |
| 5) Monetary value of budget spent on facilitating joint learning ($) |
| 6) Examples where the results of a joint learning process are being applied in the project (yes/no;number) |
| 7) Evidence/examples that lessons learned/capacity developed is feeding into another activity/future project |
| 8) Share of partners that apply their newly acquired capacities and skills in the project (%; number) |
| 9) Examples where the project experience has contributed to changes in the partner institutions (yes/no; number), e.g. by |
| a) changes in the perception among the leadership and staff |
| b) institutional papers, memos, rules and regulations that address changes |
| c) meetings taking place where changes have been discussed |
| 10) Evidence of flexibility among the partners, e.g. one partner taking over the tasks of another partner in critical situations (yes/no) |